Open Source · Apache-2.0Linux / macOS / Windows No telemetry · No paid tier
← All comparisons

fast-copy vs TeraCopy

TeraCopy's pitch is a friendlier, more reliable replacement for the Explorer copy dialog — and as a shell-integrated GUI it does that job well. fast-copy plays a different game: it reads files in physical disk order, bundles small files into streams, deduplicates identical content, and verifies everything it writes — and it still finished the benchmark below six minutes ahead, with verification on against TeraCopy's verification off.

The measured difference

11,878 files, 11.4 GB mixed workload — 9,578 small files (890 MB) plus 2,300 large files (10.5 GB) — USB 2.0 HDD to internal SSD (NTFS), Windows 11. Full reboot before each run, standby list purged with RAMMap, Defender active for both tools:

ToolTimeVerification
fast-copy19 m 06 sON — every file hash-checked
TeraCopy 4.0.3.225 m 20 sOFF

The setup deliberately favors TeraCopy — it skipped the verification pass, fast-copy did the extra work anyway. Full methodology here.

Feature differences that matter

 fast-copyTeraCopy
License / priceApache-2.0, everything freefreemium (Pro tier)
Explorer shell integrationnoyes — its core strength
Read order on diskphysical-offset sortedqueue order
Verificationon by defaultoptional (off by default for speed)
Content dedup → hard linksyesno
Scriptable CLIfirst-class (CI, cron, scripts)limited
SSH / S3 / Azure / GCS targetsbuilt inno
Linux / macOSnativeWindows only
Desktop GUIyes (cross-platform)yes

When TeraCopy is still the better tool

Honest answer: if what you want is drag-and-drop copying inside Explorer with pause/resume and a copy queue that replaces the built-in dialog, TeraCopy's shell integration is exactly that and fast-copy doesn't try to compete there. fast-copy is for when the copy is a job — backups, migrations, scripted transfers, NAS pushes — where speed, dedup and verified output are worth opening a terminal (or its own GUI) for.

Download fast-copy  ·  Windows install & SmartScreen notes: /install/windows/

Also compared: fast-copy vs rsync · fast-copy vs cp · fast-copy vs scp / SFTP · fast-copy vs Robocopy · fast-copy vs FastCopy · full benchmark methodology